MidMORiverRat
Saddle Tramp

Posts: 123
|
 |
« on: January 12, 2010, 06:59:24 AM » |
|
Looking into a .17 Fireball, .17 Rem. or a .204. More of a play gun than anything. .17 would be remingtons, but the .204 I do not know. Howa makes a nice looking rifle with thumbhole stock. Anyone know about these? Helped buy a .204 last year, but never have shot it yet. Dad must love it as he packs it everywhere  .
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Larry in SD
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: January 12, 2010, 07:15:11 AM » |
|
Not having had a .17 Fireball, .17 Remington or a .204 Ruger I can not really comment on those choices. However since the .204 Ruger is sort of the new kid on the block and taking the shooting world by storm I would guess that there would be more choices in bullets and or ammo available for it.
As per the Howa Rifles, well I have had a few and worked on several others in the form of Weatherby Vanguards, Smith & Wesson Model 1500's, and Howa's. The ones I have worked with have been .223's, .243's & .270's. I have worked up loads for several of these and all have been good shooters. The one .223 had an exceptional long throat but once the right combination of bullet, powder and seating depth was found it shot very well.
The triggers on the Howa's are adjustable, albeit a bit tricky at times. I have had to take one apart and stone off a burr and after I found that burr and stoned it the trigger ended up super. All the rest I was able to adjust. There is a built in safety feature to these triggers in that if you get the sear engagement too fine the safety can not be applied, kind of a gauge so to speak as to whether or not you have adequate sear engagement.
All in all I think the Howa is a very good value for the $$$ in a Rifle these days, but then so is Savage, Stevens and a few others.
Larry
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TomKat
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: January 12, 2010, 08:15:14 AM » |
|
I saw a skunk shot with a .17HMR a while back, it was impressive. Lights out.
There has been a lot written about the .204 Ruger, it seems to be here to stay
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
DISCLAIMER: The above post is the opinion of a gun nut, and may not be based on facts.
|
|
|
MidMORiverRat
Saddle Tramp

Posts: 123
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: January 12, 2010, 09:40:03 AM » |
|
Yea TK I have a 17 HMR in a stainless bull barrel. Impressive squirrel gun and have shot bobcats and yotes with it. Just wanting something different to add. Definitely do not need another gun, but will not go there.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Scot
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: January 12, 2010, 10:18:35 AM » |
|
Having the choices you mentioned I would purchase a 204 Ruger...hands down! I have a CZ varmint in 204 and it is nothing short of spectacular. With factory Hornady 32 gr loads it shot 1/2" or better groups right out of the box. Handloading produces similar results. It will dispatch any critter up to and including a coyote with no problem. At a distance up to 300 yards you can just hold right on and the fun part is that you can see the downrange results through your scope. Its an amazing caliber and a permanent addition to my rifle battery. You won't be disappointed owning one.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
CoAce(James)
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: January 15, 2010, 04:38:49 AM » |
|
Howa biulds a heck of a gun. They are higher dollar but you get what you pay for with them. The new AXIOM line is almost unbeatable for the money (yes it comes in 204. As for your cals you want.... Check your local store on prices and avalibilty on ammo before you decide as some you mentioned may not be cost effective as a plinker/fun gun. Going with the 204's heavier bullet weight may also be a better choice for windy day shots. the 204 will also be easier to find. What ever you decide make sure to to more homework on each before you buy. I will try to do some bullistic checks on the 3 cals you mentioned and post them up before sunday night if it helps you decide. James
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
CoAce(James)
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: January 17, 2010, 06:39:19 AM » |
|
AMMUNITION BALLISTICS FOR: .204 .17 Remington
25 gr HP 32gr PP MV of 4040 MV of 4225 At 100yards 3284fps @ 100 3632fps 200 2684fps 200 3114fps 300 2086fps 300 2652fps 400 1606fps 400 2234fps 500 1235fps 500 1836
Energy @ Muzzle 906 @Muzzle 1268 At 100 599 100 937 200 388 200 689 300 242 300 500 400 143 400 355 500 85 500 345
Trajectory at 100yrds is 1 " high At 100yrds .06 high @ 300 6" drop 300 4.2" drop 400 20" drop 400 13.5" drop 500 47" drop 500 30" drop
So now a list of Ammo prices from Midway USA
.17 Rem .204 Ruger
Box of 20 Box of 20 $27.99 $18.99 to $26.99 Midway is backordered Midway has ALOT in stock On ALL 17 REM
I hope this helps you decide between the 2. I didnt do the fireball because I dont thik it should be concidered ammo will be harder to find as will the rifle itself. If you want a diff rifle mabe concider the 221fireball or the 220 swift. Again I hope the above info helps you James
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
MidMORiverRat
Saddle Tramp

Posts: 123
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: January 17, 2010, 08:25:51 PM » |
|
Thanks for all the responses. Sorry CoAce but I believe I am leaning toward the .17 Fireball in a Remington SPS Varmit. I have 3 .223's, .22-250, .22 hornet and a .220. Just like to be different I guess.  Who knows though I might change my mind when I go to order.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TomKat
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: January 17, 2010, 08:40:04 PM » |
|
The numbers on the .204 are impressive. It would appear that SOME .243, 6mm, and .22-250 loads MAY exceed the top speed of this particular listed .204 load.... 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
DISCLAIMER: The above post is the opinion of a gun nut, and may not be based on facts.
|
|
|
MidMORiverRat
Saddle Tramp

Posts: 123
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: January 18, 2010, 02:15:36 PM » |
|
TK, Did I see somewhere that you are a 6mm man or was I just dreaming that. I have a 6mm in a M77 and have used it for deer, shooting 100 gr. Partitions and 95 gr. BT's. Do you use it for yotes and if so what bullet do you use? I have never really played with the 6mm and do not plan on myself using it much anymore. I am sure my kids will and the wife shot her first deer with it a couple of years ago. Will have to find a pic of it. Talk about beginners luck. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TomKat
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: January 18, 2010, 03:34:34 PM » |
|
Yes, I am a vocal proponent of the 6mm Remington. I got an old tang safety style M77 from CoAce in a trade some years back (THANKS JAMES!!!!  ) and have shot hundreds of prairie dogs with it. This particular rifle is a medium weight barrel and is, for my any way, to heavy to be a pratical calling rifle. But the gun shoots very good groups, I have put 5 of them in a group at 100 yards that you could cover with a dime. Its hard to find this great caliber in a light weight calling rifle. Ballisticly, its a great round and a cousin to the .243 I have been very impressed with the performance of Sierra 70 grn Match Kings and Varget in 6MM.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
DISCLAIMER: The above post is the opinion of a gun nut, and may not be based on facts.
|
|
|
|
CoAce(James)
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: January 18, 2010, 05:21:22 PM » |
|
Your welcome Tom.
MidMo you want to be diff? Try the 218 Bee
The .218 Bee
By Chuck Hawks
The .218 Bee was named for its bore diameter, it actually uses standard .224" bullets. It is based on a necked-down and blown out .25-20 case with a 15 degree shoulder. It is a neat little rimmed cartridge with an overall case length of 1.345". The SAAMI maximum average pressure for the .218 Bee is 40,000 cup.
Winchester's .218 Bee factory load uses a 46 grain hollow point bullet at a MV of 2760 fps and muzzle energy of 778 ft. lbs. At 200 yards the figures are 1550 fps and 245 ft. lbs. According to the Winchester ballistic tables, the trajectory of that load looks like this: +1.5" at 100 yards, 0 at 150 yards, and -4.2" at 200 yards.
According to the Hornady Handbook, Third Edition a 45 grain spire point bullet can be driven to a MV of 2900 fps with 13.0 grains of H4227 powder, a 50 grain spire point to 2700 fps with 14.2 grains of H4198 powder, and a 55 grain spire point to 2700 fps in front of 14.0 grains of H4198. All of the foregoing loads were developed in Winchester cases using Winchester primers. Reloaders wishing to duplicate the factory load can use the Speer 46 grain flat point bullet in front of 14.2 grains of IMR 4198 powder with a CCI primer for a MV of 2738 fps, according to Speer reloading data.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TomKat
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: January 18, 2010, 05:31:59 PM » |
|
When I was about 12 years old I shot one of these. The first rifle I ever fired. Fun to shoot then, and now.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
DISCLAIMER: The above post is the opinion of a gun nut, and may not be based on facts.
|
|
|
|
bluescout
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: January 18, 2010, 11:04:57 PM » |
|
If the .218 Bee uses a modified 25-20 case I'd hate to think of what the factory ammo would cost. I have a Winchester model 1882 lever action rifle chambered for 25-20 and the last time I checked Cabela's wanted a little over 50 bucks for a box of shells.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
CoAce(James)
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: January 19, 2010, 04:43:23 AM » |
|
Blue it is mostly a reload ammo. it can be found. winchester white box 50 loaded rounds runs $72.99 at midway.  this is a round you would want to reload Brass at midway is $36 per 100. Where as the 17 fireball ammo runs $47.99 per 50 for loaded Remington UMC. Brass is $36 per 100 Either could be loaded (per 100) for about $100 first go round and about $25 per 100 everytime after with proper brass care. Midmo I'm in no way trying to change your mind. I'm only trying to through out options for you  Keep in mind also that .172 bullets will also be a little harder to find on a local level. .224 is made alot more because of the military use. Just food for thought for you. James
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 19, 2010, 04:59:33 AM by CoAce(James) »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|